What was a requirement for claimants under the ITF Historical Interpretation before March 24, 2015?

The requirement that claimants had to identify the benefits sought under the ITF Historical Interpretation before March 24, 2015, was crucial because it ensured that the claims were specific and relevant to the veteran's circumstances. This identification allowed the processing agency to understand clearly what the claimant was requesting and to evaluate the claim based on the specific benefits that were available. By articulating their needs, claimants could facilitate a more efficient review process, ensuring that the appropriate benefits could be considered for approval.

Understanding the benefits sought by the claimant also aligns with the overarching goal of accurately addressing the needs of veterans and providing them with appropriate support. It reinforced the responsibility of the claimant to engage actively with the process and helped streamline the adjudication of claims by reducing ambiguity regarding what assistance was being requested.

In contrast, the other options do not accurately represent the requirements or guidelines in place during that period. Formal submissions, informal claims, and time limits pertain to different aspects of the claims process and do not align with the core requirement of specificity in identifying sought benefits.